New Zealand Journal of Botany abstracts
Inferring plant evolutionary history from molecular data
MICHAEL T. CLEGG
Department of Botany and Plant Sciences
University of California
Riverside, CA 92521-0124, U.S.A.
BRANDON S. GAUT
Department of Statistics
North Carolina State University
Raleigh, NC 27695, U.S.A.
MELVIN R. DUVALL
JOEL DAVIS
Department of Botany and Plant Sciences
University of California
Riverside, CA 92521-0124, U.S.A.
Abstract The rapid development of molecular
methods during the 1980s has had a profound effect
on the study of plant evolution. Molecular data have
accumulated very rapidly, and this abundance of data
poses new problems for data analysis. We illustrate
three problem areas that arise in plant evolutionary
inference. The first problem concerns the use of
molecular data to analyse closely related plant
species linked through reticulate evolution. The
second problem arises from our ability to sample
DNA sequences from alleles of a single genetic locus
within plant species. We show how cumulative
information on selection and random genetic drift
can be extracted from such data. The third problem
area concerns the limitations of current algorithms
for phylogenetic inference when confronted with
large sets of DNA sequence data. Based on a
consideration of these problem areas, we conclude
that: (1) asymmetric transmission of cpDNA markers
is useful in resolving the parentage of hybrid plant
taxa; (2) simple clustering algorithms can provide
B93022
Received 18 February 1993; accepted 26 July 1993
useful information on cultivar or variety relation-
ships, despite intervarietal hybridisation, if genetic
similarities are averaged over sufficient loci; (3)
samples of complete DNA sequence data from plant
nuclear genes can provide a new dimension of
information on historical effective population sizes
and on the mechanisms that generate allelic
diversity; (4) analyses of the chloroplast gene rbcL,
sampled from across the monocotyledon class,
reveal large variation in relative rates of nucleotide
substitution—these variations, in turn, have im-
portant consequences for phylogeny estimation
algorithms; and (5) the combined use of algorithms
like parsimony and maximum likelihood may
represent a more efficient approach to the phylo-
genetic analysis of very large (>100) sets of DNA
sequences.
Keywords monocot phylogeny; gene trees;
reticulate evolution; coalescence theory
B93022 ;
Received 18 February 1993; accepted 26 July 1993
New Zealand Journal of Botany, 1993, Vol. 31: 307-316
0028-825X/93/3103-0307 $2.50/0 © The Royal Society of New Zealand 1993
PDF file of entire paper: medium quality (804K); (scanned from paper original: notes about this process)
This year's abstracts |
Journal home page |
All abstracts |
Publishing home page