Abstract For two New Zealand species, the plant names are inappropriate references to the scent of the plant. Both result from misinterpretation of earlier work and are resolved here. Firstly, Banks & Solander originally applied the epithet aromatica to the species now known as Scandia rosifolia not to Anisotome aromatica, but as their manuscript was not published current usage is retained. Secondly, following the Forsters, the type species of Coprosma is correctly designated as C. foetidissima not the inappropriately scented C. lucida; subgeneric and sectional names are corrected.
Keywords scent; Coprosma; type species; subgeneric and sectional names; Rubiaceae; Anisotome; Scandia; Apiaceae; New Zealand
B95002
Received 9 January 1995; accepted 11 December 1995
PDF file of entire paper: medium quality (148K); (scanned from paper original: notes about this process)
This year's abstracts |Journal home page |All abstracts | Publishing home page