Information for referees
2021 Guidelines for REFEREES
The COVID-19 pandemic has had a major impact on the world economy and is likely to have long-term adverse impacts on the Research, Science and Innovation (RSI) workforce. Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment (MBIE) has held discussions with the RSI sector and heard that most early career researchers (ECRs) planning to take up employment overseas have either had offers deferred or fully rescinded, and new positions require ECRs to be within the country before applying. For those planning to remain in Aotearoa New Zealand the number of available positions has reduced.
In response to some of these acute impacts being experienced by Aotearoa New Zealand ECRs, the Government is providing support by funding a new “one off” fellowship, the MBIE Science Whitinga Fellowship.
The intent of the Fellowship is to support up and coming researchers to rise and establish a career in their chosen field of research. This is captured in the name of the Fellowship “Te whitinga mai o te rā” which can translate to “the rising of the sun”.
The MBIE Science Whitinga Fellowship is to be administered by the Royal Society Te Apārangi (the Society) on behalf of MBIE.
The objective of the funding is to support ECRs with the potential to excel in a research career who may otherwise be lost from the system due to the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on their career path.
Supporting excellent ECRs who demonstrate a passion for research, science and innovation will help Aotearoa New Zealand maintain its excellent, world-class research capability. This in turn will boost resilience in the Aotearoa New Zealand research workforce and contribute to the recovery from the effects of the pandemic.
Thirty fellowships of two years in length will be awarded by a competitive process for research undertaken in any field, including the humanities, mātauranga and social science at an eligible Aotearoa New Zealand research institution.
The earliest start date for the Fellowship is 01 July 2021.
The selection process will comprise eligibility screening, excellence filtering, a stratified selection ballot, and a final review as set out in the following process diagram. For further detailed information on the selection process please refer to the application guidelines available from Royal Society Te Apārangi’s MBIE Science Whitinga Fellowship webpage. Referee scores will be used in the excellence filtering process.
Applications must be supported by three applicant-solicited referee reports. Applications without the necessary three referee reports will be withdrawn from further consideration.
One referee must be the supervisor of applicant’s PhD programme.
If the applicant has already undertaken postdoctoral research, the supervisor of this project should be another referee.
Referees should not have a conflict of interest with the applicant, i.e. they should not hold a line of management role over the applicant at the proposed host institution, and they should not be directly involved in the applicant’s proposed research. An exemption to this rule is allowed for the supervisor of an applicant’s PhD programme and supervisor of undertaken postdoctoral research.
The referee reports plays an important part in assuring that the selection process selects applicants with the potential to excel in a research career. For this purpose, the best referees will include former supervisors who know the applicants well. It is recognised that some former supervisors will have a conflict of interest in that they have a line management role over the applicant or/and are directly involved in the applicants’ research. However, it is expected that all referees act professionally and with integrity in accordance with Royal Society Te Apārangi’s Code of Professional Standards and Ethics in Science, Technology, and the Humanities when providing a referee report.
Referees are emailed a Uniform Resource Locator (URL) link to a web-based referee portal. The timing of this invite is determined by the applicant. Applicants have been asked to confirm that their chosen referee are willing to submit a referee report before the invite is emailed to the referee.
Please note that the referee report is due on the same date as the application. We are therefore unable to provide information on the proposed research project. If you wish to learn more about the proposed research, please contact the applicant directly.
Filling out the Referee Report
Referees are asked to score applicants abilities on a series of 17 questions across four different attributes.
Referees are additionally given the opportunity to give an overall free text reference of the applicant in max 250 words that supports and further explains the given scores. The free text will be made available to the selection panel if the application is selected for final review.
Lastly, referees must indicate in what capacity they know the applicant.
Please ensure that you have familiarised yourself with the scoring indicators below in order for each applicant to the treated similarly.
- Outstanding (5) – Performance is extraordinary with no gaps or weaknesses.
- Excellent (4) – Performance is clearly strong or exemplary. Gaps or weaknesses are insignificant and managed effectively.
- Good (3) – Performance is generally strong. Gaps or weaknesses are mostly insignificant and are managed effectively.
- Adequate (2) – Performance is average. There are gaps or weaknesses which are mostly managed effectively.
- Below standard (1) – Performance is below average to poor. Some gaps or weaknesses may not be managed effectively.
- Insufficient evidence/knowledge (0) – unable to score.
The questions have been added below for your information. However, the questions must be answered directly on the referee portal, which can be accessed with the emailed URL.
|Description of Excellence
|Potential to advance knowledge
|Impact on others
As some applicants have had more years to demonstrate research excellence, referee must consider applicants in relation to their years of research experience. As an example, applicants that have only just finished their PhD, should be compared to other researcher at a similar level, and not be directly compared to researcher with 3-4 years of post-PhD research experience.
The contents of the referee reports are confidential in every respect. A referee report is submitted on the understanding that: (i) it will only be used in the appraisal process; (ii) it is confidential to the selection panels appointed by the Royal Society Te Apārangi; and, (iii) that it will not be made available to the applicant or the public (this includes all comments and grades).
Submitting referee reports
When you have finished all sections of the referee report, you must mark the report as COMPLETED on the portal before it will be included in the assessment process.
Deadline for completing the referee report
For the application to be eligible for consideration, it must be supported by the three required referee reports at the application closing day. Please ensure that your referee report is marked as completed on the referee portal no later than 20 April, 2021 at 5 pm (New Zealand Standard Time).
Referees based overseas are asked to remember the time difference between New Zealand and their location of residence to ensure their report is submitted before the New Zealand deadline.
Additional information and assistance
Additional information on the MBIE Science Whitinga Fellowships is available on the following website: https://www.royalsociety.org.nz/what-we-do/funds-and-opportunities/mbie-science-whitinga-fellowship/
If you require further assistance, please email the MBIE Science Whitinga Fellowship Secretariat at:
email@example.com or phone + 64 4 470 5764.